CUBISM
The Dawn of Cubism and The Birth of Abstract Art in Russia
Olga
Vladimirovna Rozanova (1886-1918)
From
1911 to 1915, Rozanova experimented with Neo-Primitivism, Cubo-Futurism. Her
early works show greater influence of the Italian Futurism than the French
Cubism. Rozanova's paintings of this period consist of strong straight
lines, frequently combined with triangular and circular shapes. The straight
lines and triangles are pointing in various directions; their angles are
often turned towards the center of the picture. This combination makes the
composition strong and dramatic. The triangles are made of slashing lines
that invade the picture from the sides, trying to reach the center.
In
1916 Rozanova married Kruchenykh and the same year she joined the "Supremus"
group, headed by Malevich. Perhaps influenced by Malevich's suprematist
experiments, Rozanova created some abstract compositions which further
developed the dynamic element of her earlier works. They show flat,
polygonal regions in bright colors.
After the revolution, Rozanova, thanks to her early ties to the Stroganov School, devoted her energies to the organization of industrial art in the country. She was involved with IZO Narkompros (Arts Department of the People's Commisariat of Education) and the Proletcult. Through personal persuasion and by travelling to various locations, she organized Free Art Studios (Svomas) in several provincial cities. Before she died, Rozanova drew up a plan to reorganize the museum of industrial art in Moscow. Her efforts to combine art and industrial production were soon continued and expanded by the Constructivists. When she was diagnosed ill, she was actually engaged in putting up banners and slogans for the anniversary celebration of the October Revolution. Olga Rozanova died of diphtheria a week before this event. A few weeks later, she had a posthumous exhibition, which included 250 paintings, ranging in style from Impressionism through Neo-primitivism, Cubism and Futurism to Suprematism. Although Rozanova died young, she was able to experiment widely and reach non-objectivity following her own, individual path. In the meantime, she created many remarkable paintings. Among the best known are Still Life with Scrolls (1911), The Harbor [Port] (1912), Still Life: Vase (1912), The Pub (1913), Portrait of a Woman in a Green Dress (1913), The City (1913), Writing Desk (1914), Geography (1914-15), Workbox (1915), The Metronome (1915), Non-Objective Composition (1916), Suprematism (1916), Color Composition (1917), and Untitled (Green Stripe) (1917-1918). Equally remarkable is a series of painting of playing cards, later used as one-tone illustrations for Transrational Pook: the boldly-colored Simultaneous Representation of a King of Hearts and a King of Diamonds, The Queen of Spades, The King of Clubs, and The Jack of Hearts(all 1915). [M. P-T. and A.B.]
118 CUBISM
CUBISM
Vasilii Kandinskii was a painter, a printmaker, a stage designer, a decorative artist, and a theorist. In 1886 he began to study law and economics at the University of Moscow. Three years later he took part in an ethnographiccal expedition to the Vologda province and wrote an article about folk art; this experience was to influence his early art, which would be highly decorative and would feature bright colors applied on the dark background. This effective technique can be seen in such paintings as Song of the Volga (1906), Couple Riding (1906), and Colorful Life (1907), devoted to the life of Old Russia. After traveling to St. Petersburg and Paris, in 1893 he was appointed to the Department of Law at the University of Moscow. In 1896, at the age of thirty, he gave up his successful career as a lawyer and economist to become a painter. he moved to Munich and one year later entered Anton Azbe's painting school. In 1900 he became a student at the Munich Academy and studied under Franz von Stuck.
The publication of the Almanac was one of the most important events in twentieth-century art. The artists of the Blue Rider believed in a birth of a new spiritual epoch and were engaged in the creation of symbols for their own time. There were fourteen major articles in the Almanac, interspersed with notes, quotes, and illustrations. Kandinskii published his concept of "inner necessity." He revised it in 1912, in his famous essay On the Spiritual in Art, Especially in Painting (originally written in German). For Kandinskii art was a portrayal of spiritual values. All art builds from the spiritual and intellectual life of the twentieth century. While each art form appears to be different externally, their internal properties serve the same inner purpose, of moving and refining the human soul. This belief in the secret correspondence of all the arts would become a cornerstone of his artistic convictions and a foundation of his painting.
119 CUBISM
CUBISM
The
article marked Kandinskii's transition from objective to non-objective
art. In 1914 the artist returned to Moscow and three years later married
Nina Andreevskaia. He was active as a teacher, museum worker, writer, and
lecturer. He was responsible for designing the pedagogical program for the
Institute of Artistic Culture (Inkhuk) for 1920, which included
Suprematism, Tatlin's "Culture of Materials" and Kandinskii's own
theories. The program was opposed by the future Constructivists and
Kandinskii had to wait for its implementation till his years at the
Bauhaus. In 1921 he was actively involved in the organization of Rakhn
(Russian Academy of Aesthetics). At the end of the same year, Kandinskii
went to Germany to teach at the Bauhaus, where he was to stay till its
closure by the Nazis in 1933. Participated in the Erste Russische
Kunstausstellung in Berlin (1922). In 1924, together with Feininger,
Iavlenskii, and Klee, established the Blue Four. Moved to Paris in 1933
and remained active as a painter till his death. (After The Avant-Garde in
Russia).
Beginnings: "Mother Moscow" 1866-1896.
Kandinskii
was deeply affected by Monet's Haystacks and Wagner's Lohengrin.
Disturbed by The
discovery of radioactivity, he believed that art was no longer a means of
confronting unbearable tension and disharmony, but rather the exact
opposite: it was the only way to adopt a more far-sighted position in the
world of contradictions and inconsistency.
Metamorphosis: Munich 1896-1911.
In Germany, Kandinskii developed his idea of the correspondence between a work of art and the viewer, and called it "Klang" (sound or resonance). He wrote: "Color is the power which directly influences the soul. Color is the keyboard, the eyes are the hammers, the soul is the piano with the strings. The artist is the hand which plays, touching one key or another, to cause vibrations in the soul.
121 CUBISM
CUBISM
"In
the same period of artistic development, he began to divide his paintings
into three categories: "Impressions" (which still show some representational
elements), "Improvisations" (which convey spontaneous emotional reactions),
and "Compositions" (which are the ultimate works of art, created only after
a long period of preparations and preliminaries. Characteristically,
throughout his life he completed only 10 "Compositions").
Breakthrough to the Abstract: The Blue Rider 1911-1914.
On
the Spiritual in Art included Kandinskii's ideas about the purpose of
art. He believed that the nightmare of materialism oppressed the soul of
modern man. All the arts, not just painting, were in a state of spiritual
renewal and were beginning to come closer to their objective by turning to
the abstract, the elemental. But this spiritual renewal could only grow from
a complete synthesis of all arts. Until this epoch-making moment arrived,
every art form would have to devote itself to an examination of its
individual elements. As an example of this, Kandinskii dealt with the
psychological effects of color -- one of the fundamental chapters in his
theory of art. He formulated a new harmonic theory of tones of color that
maintain their tension by means of warm and cold or light and dark
contrasts. The new conception of color and form would ultimately result in
pure painting: " . . . a mingling of color and form each with its separate
existence, but each blended into a common life which is called a picture by
the force of the inner need [necessity -- A.B.]."
In
a series of small steps Kandinskii had discovered a new concept in painting.
He had carefully removed the representational elements from his compositions
and transferred the subject matter conveyed by these elements to the
"distinctive contours" of color and form. In 1910 he had already described
the new subject matter of his paintings in the catalogue for the second
Society exhibition: "The expression of mystery by means of mystery. Is that
not the content? Is that not the conscious or unconscious purpose of the
compulsive urge to create?"
122 CUBISM
CUBISM
Russian Intermezzo 1914-1921.
Point and Line to Plane: The Bauhaus 1922-1933.
Teaching
at the Bauhaus, Kandinskii used the program elaborated for Inkhuk, with
certain modifications. In his color theory he stressed the polarity of
yellow and blue, black and white, and green and red. Alongside the
familiar symbolic classification of colors and their subdivision into
"four main tones" -- warm-cold and light-dark, Kandinskii concentrated
more on the physical basis of the classification of colors and, above all,
explored the color triad of yellow-blue-red. But his teachings about form
were essentially new, starting with an analysis of individual elements
such as point, line and plane, and examining their relationships to each
other. In connection with the growing Constructivist and Suprematist
influences at the Bauhaus, individual geometrical elements increasingly
entered the foreground of Kandinskii's work. The passionate colors of the
Munich and Moscow paintings gave way to to a cool, occasionally
disharmonious use of color. The circle -- a symbol of perfect form and a
cosmic symbol at the same time -- was the focal point of his paintings of
this period. Kandinskii's concept of synthesis remained too closely
attached to the romantic idea of a "total work of art" to fit in with the
increasingly functional orientation of the Bauhaus. The most conspicuous
transformation in the late paintings of Kandinskii was the use of most
subtly differentiated nuances of color. He seems to have left at the
Bauhaus all the constructivist color theories, based on primary and
secondary colors. He started using combinations of colors never before
seen in the world of art; most of them had a delicate filigree effect and
were reminiscent of the Slavic folk art. The colors were applied thinly,
sometimes transparently, so that they produced an added blending effect.
He also used sand to achieve a different texture. As if this new use of
color was not enough, Kandinskii dissolved the basic geometric forms into
an unbelievable variety of shapes, among which biomorphic ones
predominated. These new forms were inspired by a variety of sources, from
invertebrate sea creatures, microorganisms and zoological prototypes, to
the embryological forms. The paintings of this period are hot-headed,
seething, primaeval, as if some distant sun were trying to set life
flowing again with protoplasm in a pond. In order to divorce himself from
"abstract" Surrealism, Kandinskii redefined the idea of "concrete" art for
his own purposes: "Abstract art places a new world, which on the surface
has nothing to do with 'reality,' next to the 'real' world. Deeper down,
it is subject to the common laws of the 'cosmic world.' And so a 'new
world of art' is juxtaposed to the 'world of nature.' This 'world of art'
is just as real, just as concrete. For this reason I prefer to call
so-called 'abstract' art 'concrete' art." Kandinskii introduced a
completely new conception of painting that he bequeathed to us in a
variety of modes which were often received with hostility. It is a model
of art that is non-representational, but understandable in substance. Very
different artists and artistic trends have branched out from this model.
But the resources of Kandinskii's ideas and theories have not yet been
exhausted. (Adapted from Duechting). [K.T. and A.B.]
123 CUBISM
CUBISM
Liubov'
Sergeevna Popova (1889-1924)
"Representation of reality -- without artistic deformation and
transformation -- cannot be the subject of painting."
(From Popova's essay in the Catalogue to the 10th State Exhibition:
Non-Objective Creation and Suprematism, Moscow 1919).
125 CUBISM
CUBISM
Only in recent years Filonov's art received international recognition. The images produced by his mind contributed significantly to the intellectual growth of avant-garde in Russia. His artistic character was founded upon some uncompromising ideals to which he was committed, as he demonstrated in the early years of his work by not accepting the ideology of the Academy of Art in St.Petersburg. Filonov left the academy in 1910 and chose to ignore the mainstream current of art to further develop his personal style. Through his art, Pavel Filonov sought to observe and understand the forces that comprise the human existence, both the internal and external factors. He aimed to achieve a systematic knowledge of the world and it's human inhabitants. Filonov's paintings were in effect not mere images with meaning; -- his work went beyond that -- they were manifestations of intellectual concepts, something derived from his theory and ideology. The viewer of the art was to observe a "projective intellect" within the imagery. "A picture suggests to the mind of its viewer a single conclusion, which cannot be translated into words." After the 1917 revolution, Filonov worked to complete the development of his "analytical painting". The changes in the Russian society brought inspiration to the Futurist artists. Filonov dedicated much of his time and effort to artistic research and creativity, working on his paintings as much as 18 hours a day. In 1925, having found many followers and supporters for his style of expression, he founded a school in Petrograd, which was shut down by the government in 1928, together with all other private artistic and cultural organizations. In "Ideology of Analytical Art" Filonov explains what he expects from his student artists (and, of course, from himself): A work of art is any piece of work made with the maximum tension of analytical madness [sdelannost' -- The word is Filonov's neologism, derived from the Russian verb "sdelat'," -- to make, to do. Used in its perfectiv form, the verb denotes the completion of action]. The only professional criterion for evaluating a piece of work is its madness. In their profession the artist and his disciple must love all that is "made well" and hate all that is "not made." In analytical thought the process of study becomes an integral part of the creative process for the piece being made. The more consciously and forcefully the artist works on his intellect, the stronger the effect the finished work has on the spectator. Each brushstroke, each contact with the picture, is a precise recording through the material and in the material of the inner psychical process taking place in the artist, and the whole work is the entire recording of the intellect of the person who made it.
Art is the reflection through material or the record in material of the struggle for the formation of man's higher intellectual condition. Art's efficacy vis-à-vis the spectator is equal to this; i.e., it both makes him superior and summons him to become superior. The artist-proletarian's obligation is not only to create works that answer the demands of today, but also to open the way to intellect into the distant future. The artist-proletarian must act on the intellect of his comrade proletarians not only through what they can understand at their present stage of development. Work on content is work on form and vice versa. The more forcefully the form is expressed, the more forcefully the content is expressed. Form is made by persistent line. Every line must be made. Every atom must be made; the whole work must be made and adapted. Think persistently and accurately over every atom of the work you are doing. Make every atom persistently and accurately. Introduce persistently and accurately into every atom the color you have studied -- so that it enters the atom just as heat enters the body or so that it is linked organically with the form, just as in nature a flower's cellulose is linked with its color.
126 CUBISM
CUBISM
The
artist's fascination with construction allowed her to join other
constructivists in absolute rejection of easel painting. She gave up her own
painting and turned entirely to industrial design (1921). A year before her
untimely death, Popova was appointed head of the Design Studio at the First
State Textile Print Factory in Moscow. She excelled in industrial design of
clothing and fabrics and produced posters, book designs, ceramics, and
photomontages.Popova participated in many famous avant-garde exhibitions in
Moscow and St. Petersburg (Petrograd): Jack of Diamonds (Moscow, 1914 and
1916), Tramway V / First Futurist Exhibition of Paintings (Petrograd 1915),
0.10 / Last Futurist Exhibition of Paintings (Petrograd 1915), The Store
(Moscow, 1916), 5 x 5 = 25 (with Rodchenko, Stepanova, Vesnin and Exter),
and others.
Pavel
Nikolaevich Filonov (1883-1941)
127 CUBISM
CUBISM
Natal'ia
Sergeevna Goncharova (1881-1962)
128 CUBISM
Kazimir Severinovich Malevich: Taking in the Harvest (1911-1912)
Taking
in the Harvest, also known as Taking in the Rye, is one of the most
"radical" expressions of the Cubo-Futurist movement (Gray 150). Though
short-lived (lasting perhaps for a year or two), this movement is noteworthy
for two main reasons:
Cubo-Futurism was a
movement unique to Russia.
Most of the Russian artists
of the period passed through the Cubo-Futurist phase before moving on to
completely non-objective art.
Combining elements of French Cubism, Italian Futurism, and Neo-primitivism, Cubo-Futurism was more or less a natural stepping stone for Russian art as it began to free itself of European influences and once again established itself as a leading force in the development of the world art. As one of the most creative and inspired artists of the Russian avant-garde, Malevich was well qualified to become one of the leaders of the Cubo-Futurist movement. Taking in the Harvest expresses particularly well both Malevich's artistic temperament and the essence of the Cubo-Futurism.
Oil on
canvas, 72 x 74.5 cm. Stedelijk Museum, Amsterdam.
The color of the painting may be what strikes viewers most forcibly. The unnatural, bright metallic coloring is unexpected and, compared to other works of the time, perhaps a little shocking. If the color isn't surprising enough, however, the geometric quality of the figures certainly is -- at least from a "realistic" point of view. Though the painting is unusual, there is nothing incongruous or inharmonious about its form and composition. In fact, a kind of "Cubo-dynamic rhythm" reigns here; one senses that the figures and the bales of rye depicted on the canvas really belong there. Every movement, every bend of a body, every curve fits -- aesthetically as well as metaphorically. The simplicity of the work is also remarkable and, together with other Russian neo-primitivist paintings, harkens back to folk art and the icon painting tradition. Even the absence of perspective (except as indicated by the scale of figures) is reminiscent of icons. The impetuosity and the energy of Taking in the Harvest promises to propel the Russian avant-garde art in general, and Malevich's work in particular, into the unexplored dimension of abstract or non-representational art. [C.B.]